Measurability problems for empirical processes (Q1091031): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176992264 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2023980479 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:17, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Measurability problems for empirical processes
scientific article

    Statements

    Measurability problems for empirical processes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    Let \(X: T\times \Omega \to {\mathbb{R}}^ n\) be a uniformly bounded stochastic process, defined on a complete probability space (\(\Omega\),\(\Sigma\),P) with abstract index set T. The author introduces the notion of a consistent lifting \(\rho\) of \(L^{\infty}(\Omega)\) in such a way that in general the process \(\rho\) X has much better measurability properties than X and that \(\bar X=| \rho X-X|\) satisfies \(\bar X{}_ t=0\) a.s. for each \(t\in T.\) It is shown that X satisfies the CLT if and only if \(\rho\) X and \(\bar X\) satisfy the CLT, meaning that convergence in distribution (in an abstract sense) of appropriately centered and normalized partial sums to some Radon measure holds. This result is then applied to derive the following contraction principle without any measurability assumptions: Let X,Y be two uniformly bounded processes with \(| Y_ s(\omega)- Y_ t(\omega)| \leq | X_ s(\omega)-X_ t(\omega)|\) for all \(\omega\in \Omega\) and \(t\in T\). If X satisfies the CLT, then Y also satisfies the CLT.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Donsker class
    0 references
    consistent lifting
    0 references
    convergence in distribution
    0 references
    Radon measure
    0 references
    contraction principle
    0 references
    measurability assumptions
    0 references
    0 references