Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (Q1102916): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(87)90002-8 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2024972569 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 18:07, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems |
scientific article |
Statements
Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (English)
0 references
1987
0 references
A convolution system can have a frequency response which is small for all frequencies, yet still greatly amplify the peaks of signals passing through it. For finite-dimensional systems, however, we establish the simple bound \(\| h\|_ 1\leq (2n+1)\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\), where \(\| h\|_ 1\) is the peak gain of the system, \(\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\) is the maximum frequency response of the system, and n its dimension. The same result for continuous-time systems is due to Gohberg and Doyle and it is mentioned in ``Robust control of multivariable and large scale systems'', Final Tech. Report, Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN (1985). The bound implies that \(H^{\infty}\)-optimal controllers, which minimize the maximum of some disturbance-to-error transfer function, cannot have very large peak gains from the disturbance to error.
0 references
RMS gain
0 references
peak gain
0 references
\(H^{\infty }\)-optimal controllers
0 references