A bypass of an arrow is sectional (Q1203526): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nonexistent cycles / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 13:39, 17 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A bypass of an arrow is sectional
scientific article

    Statements

    A bypass of an arrow is sectional (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 February 1993
    0 references
    Let \((\Gamma,\tau)\) be a locally finite translation quiver with no multiple arrows or cycles. Given an arrow \(x@>\alpha>> z\), every path \(x = y_ 0 \to y_ 1 \to \dots\to y_ n = z\), with \(n\geq 2\) is called a bypass of \(\alpha\). The main question here is when is it that an arrow admits sectional bypasses. One interesting result implies that, in a connected component \(\mathcal C\) of the Auslander-Reiten quiver of an Artin algebra, if \(\mathcal C\) has no cycles, then every bypass of an arrow is sectional. Another result implies that, if the Artin algebra is of finite representation type, then an irreducible map admits no sectional bypasses.
    0 references
    locally finite translation quiver
    0 references
    sectional bypasses
    0 references
    connected component
    0 references
    Auslander-Reiten quiver
    0 references
    Artin algebra
    0 references
    finite representation type
    0 references
    irreducible map
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references