Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits (Q1317257): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176349403 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2074931146 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:54, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits (English)
    0 references
    18 April 1994
    0 references
    The authors consider the problem to test the parametric model \(\{m_ \theta\); \(\theta\in\Theta\}\) against the nonparametric alternative that only assumes \(m(\cdot)\) is `smooth'. They propose to use as a test statistics the integrated squared deviation of the parametric and nonparametric curve estimate. They show that the standard way of bootstrapping this statistics fails, however, wild bootstrap works. The validity of the asymptotic results is checked in a Monte Carlo experiment and on the fitting Engel curves in the mean expediture curve of a certain food.
    0 references
    kernel estimators
    0 references
    bootstrap
    0 references
    goodness-of-fit-test
    0 references
    integrated squared deviation
    0 references
    curve estimate
    0 references
    wild bootstrap
    0 references
    Monte Carlo
    0 references
    Engel curves
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references