Approximation on a disk. I (Q1319279): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Analyticity on Rotation Invariant Families of Curves / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5517147 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some Applications of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem to Planar Rational Approximation / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Approximation on Disks / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Approximation on Disks / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the polynomial convexity of the union of two maximal totally real subspaces of \(\mathbb C^n\) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Approximation on a disk / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 14:33, 22 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Approximation on a disk. I |
scientific article |
Statements
Approximation on a disk. I (English)
0 references
30 May 1994
0 references
In the functions \(F\) and \(G\) are defined in a neighborhood of the origin in the complex plane and behave in a certain sense as \(z^ m\) and \(\overline z^ n\) with \(\text{gcd} (m,n)=1\), then on sufficiently small closed disks \(D\) around 0 every continuous function on \(D\) can be approximated uniformly on \(D\) by polynomials in \(F\) and \(G\). A new proof of this theorem is given. Our main result is an example showing that this approximation result is in general not valid for \(m=n=2\). In the process of constructing such an example one also comes across an example of two polynomially convex closed disks \(X_ 1\) and \(X_ 2\) in \(\mathbb{C}^ 2\) which meet at only one point, which are tangent at this point and are such that the union of the two disks is not polynomially convex. [For part II, see the following review].
0 references
0 references