On the occurrence of naked singularity in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse (Q1344503): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: gr-qc/9405049 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:07, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the occurrence of naked singularity in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse
scientific article

    Statements

    On the occurrence of naked singularity in spherically symmetric gravitational collapse (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 July 1995
    0 references
    The authors investigate the collapse of spherically symmetric configurations in general relativity. For certain rather general configurations they study central singularities and find necessary and sufficient conditions for these singularities to be naked, i.e. to violate cosmic censorship. They assume that the metric and the energy momentum tensor can be simultaneously diagonalized and write \[ g = - \text{exp}(2\nu(t,r)) dt^ 2 + \text{exp}(2\psi(t,r)) dr^ 2 + R^ 2(t,r) d\Omega^ 2, \] where \(d \Omega^ 2\) is the metric of the standard 2-sphere. In these coordinates the energy momentum tensor is given by \[ T = \rho(t,r) \text{exp}(2\nu(t,r)) dt^ 2 + p_ 1(t,r) \text{exp}(2\psi(t,r)) dr^ 2 + p_ 2(r,t) R^ 2(t,r) d\Omega^ 2. \] They assume that there exists an initial \(t = t_ i\) such that for all \(t < t_ i\) spacetime is singularity-free. Further, the first central singularity is assumed to emerge at \(t = t_ i\), \(r = 0\) (They make a claim that without loss of generality they can assume \(r = 0\). However, to me it seems that their argument makes use of the condition that the central, comoving observer ends in this initial singularity). They further assume that in a neighbourhood of the singularity the functions \(r\), \(R\) instead of \(t,r\) can be used as coordinates. They write down the Einstein equation for this configuration in terms of \(F(r,R)\), \(G(r,R)\), \(H(r,R)\), \(T(r,R)\), \(p_ 2(r,R)\) where \(F(r,R)\) corresponds to the usual mass function for spherically symmetric spacetimes, \(G\), \(H\) are squares of normalized derivatives of \(R\), and \(T = {\partial R(t,r)\over \partial r}\). \(F\) and \(p_ 2\) are regarded as free functions specifying the matter model. The Einstein equation reduces then to a single parabolic PDE for \(G\). \(T\), \(H\) can be read off by inspection. In order to study the central singularity in more detail they assume that there exists an \(\alpha \geq 1\) such that \(T/r^ \alpha\) has a finite limit as the singularity is approached. They then consider the equation for radial null geodesics. It turns out that the singularity violates cosmic censorship if and only if a certain algebraic equation (their equation (25)) has real, positive solutions. Finally, they find sufficient conditions for this singularity to be a strong curvature singularity. Their result strongly suggests that known shell focussing singularities which violate cosmic censorship are stable in the spherically symmetric class.
    0 references
    naked singularity
    0 references
    central singularities
    0 references
    naked
    0 references
    cosmic censorship
    0 references
    energy momentum tensor
    0 references
    Einstein equation
    0 references
    parabolic PDE
    0 references
    radial null geodesics
    0 references
    singularity
    0 references
    strong curvature singularity
    0 references
    shell focussing singularities
    0 references
    stable
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references