On the qualitative/necessity possibility measure. I: Investigation in the framework of measurement theory (Q1582647): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q57729243, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712688784189 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q57729243 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:00, 9 April 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the qualitative/necessity possibility measure. I: Investigation in the framework of measurement theory |
scientific article |
Statements
On the qualitative/necessity possibility measure. I: Investigation in the framework of measurement theory (English)
0 references
22 September 2002
0 references
The author considers possibility measures, which are set functions \(\Pi\) satisfying \(\Pi(A)=\max\{\Pi(x): x\in A\}\). He is interested in the difference \(\Pi(x)-\Pi(y)\) as measuring validity, or strength, of the judgement ``\(A\) is more possible than \(B\)'', and explores representations of this strength via a fuzzy binary relation, or better via its membership function \(\mu(x,y)\). He shows that a representation by a function of the single variable, \(\mu(x,y)=g(\Pi(x)-\Pi(y))\) is unsatisfactory, and goes on to examine representations via functions of the two independent variables \(\Pi(x),\Pi(y)\). He shows that no polynomial function satisfies a minimal set of desirable axioms; he considers an exponential form, but this too is found inadequate. Preliminary considerations on some possible further routes conclude the paper.
0 references
possibility measures
0 references
difference measurement
0 references