Generalized tilting theory (Q1743614): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2963780161 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:49, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Generalized tilting theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Generalized tilting theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 April 2018
    0 references
    The concept of tilting module has its roots in the work \textit{I. N. Bernstein} et al. [Usp. Mat. Nauk 28, No. 2(170), 19--33 (1973; Zbl 0269.08001)] on reflection functors. Alternative, more polished, lists, still in the context of finite dimensional algebras over a field, were given shortly after by \textit{D. Happel} [Comment. Math. Helv. 62, 339--389 (1987; Zbl 0626.16008)] and by \textit{K. Bongartz} [Lect. Notes Math. 903, 26--38 (1981; Zbl 0478.16025)] and they laid the foundation of what is today called Tilting Theory. In essence, it was a generalization of Morita Theory. One of the fundamental consequences of Tilting Theory, which is the most interesting for the authors of this paper, is that it was the precursor of the so-called Morita theory for derived categories. Given small \(dg\)-categories \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\), and a \(\mathbf{B}\)-\(\mathbf{A}\)-bimodule \(\mathbf{T}\), the authors present necessary and sufficient conditions for the associated derived functors of \(\text{Hom}\) and the tensor product to be fully faithful. Special emphasis is put on the case when the derived functor \(\text{RHom}_{\mathbf A}(\mathbf{T},-)\) is fully faithful and preserves compact objects, in which case nice recollements situations appear. It is also shown that, given an algebraic compactly generated triangulated category \(\mathbf{D}\), all compactly generated co-smashing triangulated subcategories which contain the compact objects appear as the image of such a \(\text{RHom}_{\mathbf A}(\mathbf{T},-)\). The results are then applied to the case when \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) are ordinary algebras, comparing the situation with the well-stablished tilting theory of modules. Those results, when applied to ordinary algebras, show the relationship of the appearing bimodules with the concept of good tilting module and, more generally, with tilting theory. In this way, recent results by \textit{S. Bazzoni} et al. [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, No. 12, 4225--4234 (2011; Zbl 1232.16004)], \textit{H. Chen} and \textit{C. Xi} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 104, No. 5, 959--996 (2012; Zbl 1255.18013)] and \textit{D. Yang} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 140, No. 1, 83--91 (2012; Zbl 1244.18013)] have been recovered and extended.
    0 references
    triangulated category
    0 references
    \(dg\)-category
    0 references
    triangulated functor
    0 references
    tilting module
    0 references
    derived functor
    0 references
    recollement
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references