Bias of LS estimators in nonlinear regression models with constraints. II: Biadditive models. (Q1775171): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4697617 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2750808 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Analysis of Nonadditivity in Two-Way Analysis of Variance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An Analysis of a Two-Way Model with Interaction and No Replication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A New Analysis of Variance Model for Non-Additive Data / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bias of LS estimators in nonlinear regression models with constraints. I: General case. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Shifted multiplicative models for nonadditive two-way tables / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 10:05, 10 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bias of LS estimators in nonlinear regression models with constraints. II: Biadditive models.
scientific article

    Statements

    Bias of LS estimators in nonlinear regression models with constraints. II: Biadditive models. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 May 2005
    0 references
    General results given in the first part of this paper, ibid., 359--374 (1999; Zbl 1059.62557), are applied to bilinear models in ANOVA framework, called biadditive models. The determination of the approximate bias of the model parameters estimators is based on several complicated matrix expressions which are given by Jacobians and Hessians of the mean value of the observation vector and the constraints. Despite the necessity to use these complicated expressions in algorithms for the determination of the bias, the resulting formulae are surprisingly simple. In particular, the response estimators are shown to be approximately unbiased. Authors checked the validity of the approximation by simulation with a good agreement.
    0 references
    asymptotic variance
    0 references
    bilinear model
    0 references
    nonlinear least squares
    0 references
    response function
    0 references
    second order approximation
    0 references

    Identifiers