Vanishing exponential integrability for functions whose gradients belong to \(L^n(\log(e+L))^{\alpha}\) (Q1869044): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4858060 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4039801 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An extension of Hedberg's convolution inequality and applications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Double exponential integrability of convolution operators in generalized Lorentz-Zygmund spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sobolev inequalities of exponential type / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4002299 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4693168 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5614914 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Isoperimetric Inequalities in Mathematical Physics. (AM-27) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5607484 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3142876 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Weakly Differentiable Functions / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:03, 5 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Vanishing exponential integrability for functions whose gradients belong to \(L^n(\log(e+L))^{\alpha}\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Vanishing exponential integrability for functions whose gradients belong to \(L^n(\log(e+L))^{\alpha}\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 April 2003
    0 references
    Recently, there has been considerable interest in extending the classical Trudinger exponential-type inequality to other situations. One such extension appears in the paper by \textit{D. E. Edmunds} and \textit{R. Hurri-Svrjanen} [Isr. J. Math. 123, 61-92 (2001; Zbl 0991.46019)] showing that if \(u = u(x) \) is a weakly differentiable function on \(\mathbb R^n\) which satisfies \[ \int_B \Phi_{\alpha}(\nabla u) da \leq 1, \] where \(\Phi_{\alpha}(t) = t^n(\log(e + t))^\alpha \), \(t > 0\) and \(0 \leq \alpha \leq n -1\), then there are positive constants \(a\) and \(c_{\alpha}\) independent of \(u\) such that \[ \oint_B \exp (a u(x) - u_B ^{n/(n-1-\alpha)})dx \leq c_{\alpha} \tag{1.1} \] for any ball \(B \subset \mathbb R^n\) when \(\alpha < n-1\). When \(\alpha = n -1\), there is an additional constant \(b > 0\) independent of \(u\) such that \[ \oint_B \exp(a\exp(b u(x) - u_B ^{n/(n-1)}))dx \leq c_{n-1}. \tag{1.2} \] One problem with estimates (1.1) and (1.2) is that they give very little information as to the behavior of these averages when the radius of the ball \(B\) tends to zero. In the paper under review, the authors ask whether is it possible to refine these estimates so that the constants \(c_{\alpha}\) are independent of both \(u\) and \(B\). When \(\alpha = 0\), it is proven in Proposition 3.3 of the first author's notes [Lectures on \(L^p\)-Potential Theory, University of Umea] that \[ \oint_{B(x_0,r)} \left[ \exp(a u(x) - u(x_0) ^{p/(p-1)}) - 1 \right]dx = o(1) \tag{1.3} \] as \(r\) tends to zero, for almost every \(x_0\), modulus \(C_{\beta,p}\), the Bessel capacity, \(\beta p = n\), some constant \(a> 0\) independent of \(u\) and \(r\), with \(u = G_{\beta} \ast f\), a Bessel potential of order \(\beta > 0\), and \(f\) an \(L^p\)-integrable function on \(R^n\). In particular, when \(\beta = 1\), \[ \oint_{B(x_0,r)} \left[ \exp(a u(x) - u(x_0) ^{n/(n-1)}) - 1 \right]dx = o(1) \tag{1.4} \] \(C_{1,n}\)- a.e. \(x_0\) when \(\int \bigtriangledown u ^n dx < \infty\). On the other hand, for \(\Phi_{\alpha}\), a result by \textit{A. Cianchi} and \textit{B. Stroffolini} [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 227, 166-186 (2001; Zbl 0914.42014)] (1.4) only implies \[ \oint_{B(x_0,r)} \left[ \exp(a \exp(b u(x) - u(x_0))^{n/(n-1) - \delta}) - e^a \right]dx = o(1) \tag{1.5} \] as \(r\) tends to zero, for every \(\delta >0\) and \(C_{1,\Phi_{n-1}}\) - a.e. \(x_0\) and some constant \(a > 0\) independent of \(u\). It is unknown if (1.5) holds for \(\delta = 0\). The main result of the present paper (Theorem 1.6) is a subsitute for (1.5) when \(\delta = 0\) which is reproduced below. Theorem. Let \(\Psi_{\alpha}(t) = t^n (\log (e + \frac{1}{t}))^{- \alpha}\), \(t > 0\) and \(0 \leq \alpha n - 1\), then \(\int \Psi_{\alpha}(\nabla u)dx < \infty\) implies \[ \oint _{B(x_0,r)} \left[\exp \left (a \Psi_{\alpha}( u(x) - u(x_0))^{\frac{1}{n-1- \alpha}} \right) - 1 \right]dx = o(1) \] \(C_{\Psi_{\alpha}}\)- a.e. \(x_0\), \(\alpha < n - 1\), as \(r \to 0\), and \[ \oint _{B(x_0,r)} \left[\exp \left (a (b\Psi_{n-1}( u(x) - u(x_0))^{\frac{1}{n-1}} \right) - e^a1 \right]dx = o(1) \] \(C_{\Psi_{n-1)}}\)- a.e. \(x_0\), as \(r \to 0\), when \(\alpha = n - 1\), for some constants \(a > 0\) and \(b > 0\). Capacities \(C_{\Psi_{\alpha}}\) are introduced and their basic properties are established.
    0 references
    Trudinger exponential-type inequality
    0 references

    Identifiers