How to improve a random number generator (Q1971517): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-4655(99)00434-8 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2166816996 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:49, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | How to improve a random number generator |
scientific article |
Statements
How to improve a random number generator (English)
0 references
6 December 2000
0 references
Numerical experiments with random walking indicate the sensitivity of the results on the autocorrelation of the used (pseudo)random numbers. The author experiment with the double randomization technique. This technique uses one generator to produce a large array of random numbers. A second generator (not necesarily a different one) samples numbers from the array. Experiments are performed with various combinations of generators. The results of random walking experiments using the numbers are used as the indicator of the quality of such tools. The conclusion, not surprising, is that the quality depends mainly on the quality of the generator filling the array. One combination of generators has very good results. The paper presents no formal tests. All its conclusions are based on the diagrams showing graphically the results of the random walk experiments.
0 references
random number generation
0 references
autocorrelation
0 references
random walk
0 references
numerical examples
0 references
pseudo-random numbers
0 references