New estimates of \(q_1 q_2\)-Ostrowski-type inequalities within a class of \(n\)-polynomial prevexity of functions (Q2198783): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3720798 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W3045056026 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 19:25, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | New estimates of \(q_1 q_2\)-Ostrowski-type inequalities within a class of \(n\)-polynomial prevexity of functions |
scientific article |
Statements
New estimates of \(q_1 q_2\)-Ostrowski-type inequalities within a class of \(n\)-polynomial prevexity of functions (English)
0 references
15 September 2020
0 references
A new class of functions, the so called class of \(n\)-polynomial preinvex functions is defined. Let \(\Omega_{\eta}\) be an invex subset of \(\mathbb{R}^n\). Let \(n\in \mathbb{N}\). A non-negative function \(\Phi : \Omega_{\eta} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is called \(n\)-polynomial preinvex if \[ \Phi (x+t\cdot \eta(y,x)) \leq \frac 1n \sum_{p=1}^n [1-(1-t)^p] \Phi(x) + \frac 1n \sum_{p=1}^n (1-t^p) \Phi(y) \] for all \(x,y \in \Omega_{\eta} \) and \(t\in [0,1]\). Let \(q_1,q_2 \in (0,1)\), \(x_1< y_1\), \(x_2< y_2\), \(\Phi : \mathcal{N} \subset \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow {\mathbb R}\) such that its mixed partial \(q_1q_2\)-derivative is continuous and integrable on \([x_1, x_1+\eta_1(y_1,x_1)] \times [x_2, x_2+\eta_2(y_2,x_2)] \subset \mathcal{N}^o\) and \(n\)-polynomial preinvex with certain additional properties. Using the new identity for a \(q_1q_2\)-differentiable function \(\Phi\), upper bounds for the following term are given \[ \left| \Phi(s,r) + \frac{1}{\eta_2(y_2,x_2)} \left[ \int_{x_2}^{x_2+\eta_2(r,x_2)} \Phi(s,v)_0 d_{q_2}v + \int_{y_2}^{y_2+\eta_2(r,y_2)} \Phi(s,v)_0 d_{q_2}v \right]\right. \] \[+ \left. \frac{1}{\eta_1(y_1,x_1)} \left[ \int_{x_1}^{x_1+\eta_1(s,x_1)} \Phi(u,r)_0 d_{q_1}u + \int_{y_1}^{y_1+\eta_1(s,y_1)} \Phi(u,r)_0 d_{q_1}u \right] - Q \right|,\] where \[Q=\frac{1}{\eta_1(y_1,x_1)\eta_2(y_2,x_2)} \left\{ \int_{x_1}^{x_1+\eta_1(s,x_1)} \int_{x_2}^{x_2+\eta_2(r,x_2)} \Phi(u,v)_0d_{q_1}u_0d_{q_2}v \right. \] \[ +\int_{x_1}^{x_1+\eta_1(s,x_1)} \int_{y_2}^{y_2+\eta_2(r,y_2)} \Phi(u,v)_0d_{q_1}u_0d_{q_2}v \] \[+ \int_{y_1}^{y_1+\eta_1(s,y_1)} \int_{x_2}^{x_2+\eta_2(r,x_2)} \Phi(u,v)_0d_{q_1}u_0d_{q_2}v \] \[ + \left. \int_{y_1}^{y_1+\eta_1(s,y_1)} \int_{y_2}^{y_2+\eta_2(r,y_2)} \Phi(u,v)_0d_{q_1}u_0d_{q_2}v \right\}. \] It is worth to mention that several serious misprints occur in Section 2.
0 references
\(n\)-polynomial preinvex function
0 references
partial \(q_1q_2\)-derivative
0 references
quantum integral identity
0 references
Ostrowski-type inequalities
0 references