On the problem of equivariant homotopic classification (Q1924585): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the winding number and equivariant homotopy classes of maps of manifolds with some finite group actions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5658847 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Transformation groups and representation theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Transformation groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4112654 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:19, 24 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the problem of equivariant homotopic classification
scientific article

    Statements

    On the problem of equivariant homotopic classification (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    23 June 1997
    0 references
    This paper has four sections. First the authors recall some facts on a classical theorem of H. Hopf and on obstruction theory, then they formulate their version of the equivariant Hopf theorem and prove it in Section 4. Making the following assumptions (i) \(G\) is a compact Lie group, \(X\) is a \(G\)-complex of a finite orbit type and \(Y\) is a \(G\)-space (ii) For every \(H\in\text{Iso}(X)\) the space \(X^H\) is a finite-dimensional \(W(H)\)-complex of topological dimension \(n(H)>0\); the space \(Y^H\) is locally and globally \(k\)-connected for each \(k=0,1,\dots, n(H)-\dim W(H)\), if \(|W(H)|=\infty\) and locally and globally \(k\)-connected for each \(k=0,1, \dots,n(H)-1\) otherwise (iii) Let \(\Phi(G,X,Y)= \{H \in\text{Iso} (X):W(H)\) finite, \(\pi_{n(H)} (Y^H)\neq 0\}\) and for \(H\in\Phi(G,X,Y)\) they assume that \(\pi_{n (H)} (Y^H)=Z\) and \(H^{n(H)} (Y^H)=Z\). Let denote the generators \(O_H\in H^{n(H)} (Y^H)\) the authors prove: (a) the set \([X;Y]_G\) of the equivariant homotopy classes is not empty; (b) Let \(H\in\Phi (G,X,Y)\), \(\dim(X^{>H}) <n(H)\) and \(f_1^H\), \(f_2^H: X^H\to Y^H\) are \(W(H)\)-equivariant maps such that \(f_1^H|X^{>H}\), \(f_2^H|X^{>H}\) are \(W(H)\)-equivariantly homotopic. Then \((f_1^H)^*(O_H) \equiv (f_2^H)^* (O_H) \pmod {w_H \cdot H^{n (H)} (X^H)}\). (c) Let \(f:X^{>H}\to Y^H\) be a \(W(H)\)-equivariant map, let \(H\) be as in (b) and let \(\beta\in H^{n(H)} (X^H)\). Then there exists a pair of \(W(H)\)-equivariant extensions \(f_1^H\), \(f_2^H:X^H\to Y^H\) of the map \(f\) such that \((f_1^H)^*(O_H) \equiv (f_2^H)^* (O_H)+ w_H \cdot\beta\). (d) The statement ``\(f_1,f_2:X\to Y\) are \(G\)-equivariant homotopic iff \((f_1|_{X^H})^* (O_H)\equiv (f_2|_{X^H})^*(O_H)\) for every \(H\in\Phi (G,X,Y)\)'' is equivalent to the following condition: \(\text{Ker} j^*|w_H\cdot H^{n(H)} (X^H,X^{>H})=0\) for every \(H\in\Phi (G,X,Y)\). So they generalize results on equivariant homotopy classification obtained by T. tom Dieck, E. Laitinen, J. Thornehave.
    0 references
    0 references
    equivariant maps
    0 references
    equivariant Hopf theorem
    0 references
    equivariant homotopy classes
    0 references