No three element set is ruinous (Q2491175): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-005-0552-7 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W1966064106 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 01:36, 20 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | No three element set is ruinous |
scientific article |
Statements
No three element set is ruinous (English)
0 references
26 May 2006
0 references
The question of whether or not the group \(F\) introduced by R. Thompson is amenable is an open question. The author has shown in his Ph.D. thesis that the existence of a ruinous set in a generating subsemigroup \(N\) of \(F\) implies the nonamenability of \(F\). In this paper, he shows that no subset of \(N\) of at most three elements is ruinous.
0 references
Thompson's group F
0 references
ruinous set
0 references
