Accuracy evaluation of unsteady CFD numerical schemes by vortex preservation (Q2564675): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(95)00023-6 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2011376508 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:34, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Accuracy evaluation of unsteady CFD numerical schemes by vortex preservation
scientific article

    Statements

    Accuracy evaluation of unsteady CFD numerical schemes by vortex preservation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 November 1997
    0 references
    Evaluation of vortex preservation during convection is a reasonable tool to examinate the accuracy of numerical schemes in computer fluid dynamics: during convection of a vortex in freestream, pressure is at a minimum in the vortex core and increases concentrically and asymptotically to the freestream value with radial distance from the vortex center. But a numerically dissipative scheme cannot maintain a pressure minimum at the center. Similarly, the concentric structure of the vortex remains unaltered with downstream convection; however, certain numerical schemes distort the pattern, and solution oscillation appears. To explore the quality of some numerical schemes, the papers considers a vortex of finite core, see the classical description in the book by \textit{H. Lamb} [e.g. Hydrodynamics, 6th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press (1993; Zbl 0828.01012)], and follows up its path in travelling downstream over a distance of 45 radii of the core. The basis of the numerical method used herein is the Navier-Stokes code of \textit{W. R. Briley} and the second author [J. Comp. Phys. 24, 372-397 (1977; Zbl 0363.76018)]. These are a central difference scheme, first-order accurate in time, and an improved version of second-order accuracy in time and with multiple iterations at each time step, both for three difference grids. Effects of non-uniformity of grids or of cell aspect ratio are not considered. Altogether, such a study of physically relevant effects is always worthwhile.
    0 references
    pressure in vortex core
    0 references
    pressure minimum
    0 references
    vortex of finite core
    0 references
    Navier-Stokes code
    0 references
    central difference scheme
    0 references
    multiple iterations
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers