How far can we go with Amitsur's theorem in differential polynomial rings? (Q2627988): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q105318639, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710857717480
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q105318639 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:18, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How far can we go with Amitsur's theorem in differential polynomial rings?
scientific article

    Statements

    How far can we go with Amitsur's theorem in differential polynomial rings? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 2017
    0 references
    Let \(R\) be a noncommutative associative ring. The well-known Amitsur's Theorem states that the Jacobson radical of the polynomial ring \(R[x]\) equals \(I[x]\) for some nil ideal \(I\) of \(R\). Therefore, it is natural to ask whether this theorem also holds for differential polynomial rings. In this paper, the author gives a negative answer to this question by showing that if \(K\) is an arbitrary subfield of the algebraic closure of a finite field, then there exists a \(K\)-algebra \(R\) and a derivation \(D\) on \(R\) such that \(R\) is not nil and the algebra \(R[X;\) \(D]\) is Jacobson radical. However, if \(F\) is a field of characteristic \(p>0\) and \(R\) is an \(F\)-algebra with a locally nilpotent derivation \(D\) on \(R\), then the Jacobson radical of the differential polynomial ring \(R[x;\) \(D]\) equals \(I[X]\) for some nil ideal \(I\) of \(R\).
    0 references
    Amitsur's theorem
    0 references
    Jacobson radical
    0 references
    differential polynomial ring
    0 references

    Identifiers