Goodwillie calculus via adjunction and LS cocategory (Q505342): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: MaRDI profile type (P1460): MaRDI publication profile (Q5976449), #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710362833254 |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 1209.2384 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 14:34, 18 April 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Goodwillie calculus via adjunction and LS cocategory |
scientific article |
Statements
Goodwillie calculus via adjunction and LS cocategory (English)
0 references
20 January 2017
0 references
This paper brings together two concepts, homotopy calculus of functors and Lusternik-Schnirelmann (LS) (co)category. Homotopy calculus approximates a homotopy functor \(F\) by a tower of functors \[ F\longmapsto(\ldots\to P_nF\to P_{n-1}\to\ldots \to P_1F). \] The LS category of a space \(X\) is roughly the least amount of contractible open sets required to cover \(X\). According to the author, this paper arose from the observation that an alternative definition of LS cocategory (an appropriately dualized notion of LS category) can be stated in terms of homotopy calculus of functors. In more detail, in the construction of the functors \(P_nF\), there is an intermediate construction of functors \(T_nF\). Iterating \(T_nF\) and taking the homotopy colimit of the natural transformations between these iterates gives \(P_nF\). The main result of the paper is that there exists a pair of adjoint functors \((R_n, L_n)\) such that \[ T_nF\simeq R_nFL_n. \] The equivalence is an equality for functors that are \textit{strongly reduced}, namely \(F(*)=*\). In particular, for the identity functor \(\mathbb I\), \(T_n\mathbb I=R_nL_n\) is a monad. The functors \(L_n\) and \(R_n\) go between the category of spaces and the category of cubical diagrams missing the last space that are coreduced (all spaces indexed on non-singletons are contractible). They are given essentially by making a punctured cubical diagram into a reduced one and by taking the homotopy limit, respectively. A reformulation of the main result is that \(X\) has symmetric LS cocategory \(\leq n\) iff \(X\) is a homotopy retract of \(T_n\mathbb I(X)\). This leads to some nice consequences. For example, the author deduces that \(T_nF\) and \(P_nF\) take values in spaces of LS cocategory \(\leq n\) and that Whitehead products of lengths \(n+1\) vanish in spaces \(T_nF(X)\) and \(P_nF(X)\) for all \(X\) and for \(n\geq 1\). There are also the corresponding dual functors \(R^n\) and \(L^n\) and the author uses these to develop a dual homotopy calculus, thereby extending work done in [\textit{R. McCarthy}, Contemp. Math. 271, 183--215 (2001; Zbl 0996.19005)]. She defines \(T^n\) as \(L^nFR^n\), and this definition allows for the iteration that produces \(P^nF\), exactly dualizing the original homotopy calculus setup. This dual iteration is the piece that has been missing from the theory. The author also establishes the natural dual of her main result which says that \(X\) has symmetric LS category \(\leq n\) iff the map \(T_n\mathbb I(X)\to X\) has a section up to homotopy. The author elucidates the relationship between functor calculus and LS cocategory very nicely and provides ample background on cubical diagrams, functor calculus, and LS category to make for a largely self-contained exposition. She also states some interesting conjectures, specifically regarding the nilpotence of \(T_nF\), and further potential avenues of investigation.
0 references
LS category
0 references
LS cocategory
0 references
Goodwillie calculus
0 references
homotopy limit
0 references
nilpotence
0 references