Almost squares in arithmetic progression. III (Q2486116): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: MaRDI profile type (P1460): MaRDI publication profile (Q5976449), #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710541407615
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: THE EQUATIONS 3<i>x</i><sup>2</sup>−2 = <i>y</i><sup>2</sup> AND 8<i>x</i><sup>2</sup>−7 = <i>z</i><sup>2</sup> / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Logarithmic forms and group varieties. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The product of consecutive integers is never a power / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost squares in arithmetic progression (II) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On perfect powers in products with terms from arithmetic progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4432172 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4432173 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3490075 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:59, 10 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Almost squares in arithmetic progression. III
scientific article

    Statements

    Almost squares in arithmetic progression. III (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 August 2005
    0 references
    In Part I [Compos. Math. 138, No. 1, 73--111 (2003; Zbl 1036.11007)] \textit{N. Saradha} and the second author showed that a product of four or more terms of positive integers in arithmetic progression with common difference a prime power is never a square. More general results were obtained that completely solve this equation when \(\gcd(n,d)=1\), \(k\geq 3\), and \(1<d\leq 104\). For \(i_ 0\) with \(0\leq i_0\leq k-1\), the equation \[ n(n+d)\cdots(n+(i_ 0-1)d)(n+(i_0+1)d)\cdots(n+(k-1)d)=by^2, \] with \(d>1\), \(w(d)=1\) and \(P(b)<k\), implies that \(k\leq 24\) where for a positive integer \(a\), \(P(a)\) and \(w(a)\) denote the greatest prime factor and the number of distinct prime factors of \(a\). Here it is proved that under the same assumptions it follows \(k\leq 8\). For Part II, see Acta Arith. 110, No. 1, 1--14 (2003; Zbl 1030.11010).
    0 references

    Identifiers