Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families (Q1865964): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
m rollbackEdits.php mass rollback Tag: Rollback |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2003.9.383 / rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2083389642 / rank | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 21 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families |
scientific article |
Statements
Discrete admissibility and exponential dichotomy for evolution families (English)
0 references
5 March 2004
0 references
Here, the authors study connections between admissibility and uniform exponential dichotomy for discrete and continuous evolution families. In the discrete case, they show that, for an evolution family with uniform exponential growth, an exponential dichotomy is equivalent to the admissibility of the pair \((c_0(X),c_{00}(X))\), where \(X\) is a Banach space and the sequence spaces \(c_0(X)=\{s:{\mathbb Z}_+\rightarrow X: \lim_{n\to\infty}s(n)=0\}\), \(c_{00}(X)=\{s\in c_0(X): s(0)=0\}\) are endowed with the sup-norm. Having this result at hand, the authors are able to give a new proof of an admissibility theorem due to \textit{Nguyen Van Minh, F. Räbiger} and \textit{R. Schnaubelt} [Integral Equations Oper. Theory 32, 332--353 (1998; Zbl 0977.34056)]. This theorem states that, in a continuous setting, the uniform exponential dichotomy of a strongly continuous evolution family is equivalent to the admissibility of the pairs \((C_0(X),C_0(X))\) and \((C_0(X),C_{00}(X))\), respectively, with \(C_0(X)=\{s:{\mathbb R}_+\rightarrow X: \lim_{t\to\infty}s(t)=0\}\), \(C_{00}(X)=\{s\in C_0(X): s(0)=0\}\) equipped with the sup-norm.
0 references
evolution family
0 references
uniform exponential dichotomy
0 references