The set of dominance-minimal roots (Q1270077): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5580319 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A finiteness property and an automatic structure for Coxeter groups / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Machine calculations in Weyl groups / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3998721 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The reflection representations of some Chevalley groups / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 15:59, 28 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The set of dominance-minimal roots |
scientific article |
Statements
The set of dominance-minimal roots (English)
0 references
21 February 2000
0 references
This article examines the set of so-called dominance-minimal, or elementary roots of a Coxeter system. An earlier paper by \textit{B. Brink} and \textit{R. B. Howlett} [Math. Ann. 296, No. 1, 179-190 (1993; Zbl 0793.20036)] showed that this set is finite, but the bound given in that paper was impractically large. This paper vastly improves the earlier result, giving a method whereby the set of dominance-minimal roots may be explicitly constructed. The paper also lists the sets of dominance-minimal roots for certain special Coxeter systems. Since the finiteness of the set of dominance-minimal roots is linked to the fact that Coxeter groups have an automatic structure, the author expects that her results will be useful to those who wish to develop algorithms for Coxeter groups. The article is structured as follows: Section 1 introduces the main results and the motivation for them, and Section 2 gives some of the necessary background material, including the definitions of two partial orders, precedance and dominance. Readers in danger of confusing the two should read this section carefully, especially the comments at the end of the second-last paragraph on page 374. Section 3 outlines the strategy used to characterise the sets of dominance-minimal roots, which is as follows. The set of dominance-minimal roots \(\mathcal E\) is expressed as the disjoint union of sets \(\mathcal E_S\) derived from subsystems \((W_S,S)\) of the original Coxeter system. The article gives a means of calculating \(\mathcal E_S\) inductively from the sets \(\mathcal E_{S'}\) for which \(S'\) is a subset of \(S\). In Section 4, \(\mathcal E_S\) is shown to be empty for a large class of Coxeter subsystems \((W_S,S)\), and the remaining sections calculate \(\mathcal E_S\) explicitly for a large class of those cases still remaining. This is more than sufficient to calculate \(\mathcal E_S\) for any desired subsystem, and hence to calculate \(\mathcal E\) for any finite-rank Coxeter group. The paper contains many easy-to-read diagrams illustrating the sets of dominance-minimal roots so obtained.
0 references
Coxeter groups
0 references
Coxeter systems
0 references
root systems
0 references
dominance minimal roots
0 references
elementary roots
0 references