Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs (Q557701): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Topological Entropy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dynamics in one dimension / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the abundance of aperiodic behaviour for maps on the interval / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3993502 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Period Three Implies Chaos / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Euler's finite difference scheme and chaos in \(R^ n\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4271974 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4274312 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4226356 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Euler's finite difference scheme and chaos / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:05, 10 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs
scientific article

    Statements

    Dynamics in numerics: On two different finite difference schemes for ODEs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 June 2005
    0 references
    For a special type of ordinary differential equation (ODE), namely a Kolmogorov type differential equation which models the population growth of single species, the authors compare, from the viewpoint of dynamical systems, two finite difference schemes: Euler's scheme and the so called integral approximation scheme, both applied on the unbounded interval \([0,\infty)\). By developing some general formulas, they discuss the stability of the common equilibrium, the periodic doubling bifurcations and their stability and the chaos in the both schemes. By comparing these formulas and some numerical examples, the authors find that the Euler scheme is better than the integral approximation scheme in terms of the stepsize parameter. The results proved in this paper involve some concepts from dynamical systems, like: topological chaos, Schwarzian derivative, periodic orbit, scrambled set, etc.
    0 references
    finite difference scheme
    0 references
    stability
    0 references
    equilibrium
    0 references
    periodic doubling
    0 references
    topological chaos
    0 references
    Schwarzian derivative
    0 references
    population growth
    0 references
    dynamical systems
    0 references
    Euler's scheme
    0 references
    integral approximation
    0 references
    bifurcations
    0 references
    numerical examples
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references