Partition identities arising from theta function identities (Q943535): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4508903 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5513003 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Partition identities and Ramanujan's modular equations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Partition-theoretic interpretations of certain modular equations of Schröter, Russell, and Rama\-nujan / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4000402 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4374999 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:40, 28 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Partition identities arising from theta function identities
scientific article

    Statements

    Partition identities arising from theta function identities (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 September 2008
    0 references
    This paper is devoted to a study of the combinatorics of identities that generally have the form \[ f(q) + f(-q) = g(q) \] or \[ f(q) - f(-q) = qh(q), \] where \(f(q)\) is some infinite product which is essentially a modular function. The motivation is one such identity of \textit{H. M. Farkas} and \textit{I. Kra} [Contemp. Math. 251, 197--203 (2000; Zbl 1050.11086)], \[ (-q;q^2)_{\infty}(-q^7;q^{14})_{\infty} - (q;q^2)_{\infty}(q^7;q^{14})_{\infty} = 2q(-q^2;q^2)_{\infty}(-q^{14};q^{28})_{\infty}, \] which, along with its combinatorial interpretation, was popularized and generalized by \textit{S. O. Warnaar} [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 110, No. 1, 43--52 (2005; Zbl 1101.11046)]. Here we have used the usual basic hypergeometric notation. Of course if \(f(q)\) is a modular function then both the sum \(f(q) + f(-q)\) and the difference \(f(q) - f(-q)\) will both be so as well. The authors identify around 15 cases where this sum or difference is an infinite product and offer combinatorial interpretations in terms of colored partitions. For example, we record their Theorem 3.4: Let \(A(N)\) denote the number of partitions of \(2N+1\) into odd parts that are not multiples of \(3\), with each having two colors, say orange and blue. Let \(B(N)\) denote the number of partitions of \(2N\) into four distinct colors, with two colors, say red and green, appearing at most once and only in multiples of \(2\), one color, say pink, appearing at most once and only in multiples of \(4\), and the remaining color, say violet, appearing at most once and only in multiples of \(12\). Then for \(N \geq 2\), we have \(A(N) = 2B(N)\). This follows from the identity \[ \begin{multlined} \frac{1}{(q;q^6)_{\infty}^2(q^5;q^6)_{\infty}^2} - \frac{1}{(-q;q^6)_{\infty}^2(-q^5;q^6)_{\infty}^2} = 4q(-q^2;q^2)_{\infty}^4(-q^4;q^4)_{\infty}(-q^{12};q^{12})_{\infty}.\end{multlined} \] The authors' proofs of such identities rely heavily on work of \textit{H. Schröter} [De aequationibus modularibus, Dissertatio Inauguralis, Albertina Litterarum Universitate, Regiomonti, Königsberg, 1854].
    0 references
    partitions
    0 references
    colored partitions
    0 references
    partition identities
    0 references
    theta function identities
    0 references
    modular equations
    0 references

    Identifiers