A random approach to the Lebesgue integral (Q2467772): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A first return examination of the Lebesgue integral. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Almost every sequence integrates / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: First-return limiting notions in real analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Probability: A Graduate Course / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4285292 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Lebesgue Integral as the Almost Sure Limit of Random Riemann Sums / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Randomly sampled Riemann sums and complete convergence in the law of large numbers for a case without identical distribution / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:04, 27 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A random approach to the Lebesgue integral
scientific article

    Statements

    A random approach to the Lebesgue integral (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    28 January 2008
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal P=(I_k)_{k=1}^n\) be a partition of the unit interval and let \(f\) be Lebesgue measurable there. A random Riemann sum is constructed by looking at the evaluation points \(t_k\in I_k\) in the usual Riemann sum as random variables over \(I_k\) with uniform distribution. One then gets the random sum \(S_{\mathcal P}(f)=\sum_{k=1}^n f(t_k)| I_k| \). It is now easy to see that the expectation of \(S_{\mathcal P}(f)\) is the Lebesgue-integral of \(f\) over the unit interval. Now let the size, \(\delta=\max_k | I_k| \), of \(\mathcal P\) tend to zero. It turns out that the following weak law of large numbers is true: Assume \(f\) has a Lebesgue integral \(\int f\) over the unit interval. Then the random Riemann sums of a sequence of partitions whose sizes tend to 0 converges in probability to \(\int f\). The corresponding result for almost sure convergence is not true and much harder to analyze. Almost sure convergence of random Riemann sums depends on the way the sizes of the sequence of the partitions tend to 0. The author proves that if \(f\in L_p\), \(p>1\) and the sizes \(\delta_n\) of the sequence \({\mathcal P}_n\) tend to 0 as an \(\ell_{p-1}\) sequence, then almost sure convergence of the random Riemann sums towards \(\int f\) holds. In the other direction the author proves that for every \(p>1\) and every \(\epsilon>0\) there is an \(f\in L_{p-\varepsilon}\) and a sequence \(({\mathcal P}_n)\) with \((\delta_n)\in \ell_{p-1}\) such that \(P(S_{{\mathcal P}_n}(f)-\int f)=0\)! This is not for the first time that random Riemann sums have been studied, as remarked by the author at the end of the paper. \textit{J. C. Kieffer} and \textit{C. V. Stanojevic} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 85, 389--392 (1982; Zbl 0497.28007)] studied almost sure convergence of random Riemann sums, but with other demands on how to pick evaluation points. Further path to the history of randomized Riemann integral can be found via the review of that paper in Math Reviews, see [MR0656109 (83h:26015)]. \textit{C. S. Kahane} [Math. Jap. 38, No. 6, 1073--1076 (1993; Zbl 0795.28004)] and \textit{A. R. Pruss} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 124, No. 3, 919--929 (1996; Zbl 0843.60031)] considered almost sure convergence with uniform partitions and revealed the phenomenon \(f\in L_2\leftrightarrow (\delta_n)\in \ell_1\).
    0 references
    0 references
    Random Riemann integral
    0 references
    Almost sure convergence
    0 references

    Identifiers