Well-behaved derivations on \(C[0,1]\) (Q1084645): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1984.115.73 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/PJM.1984.115.73 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:21, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Well-behaved derivations on \(C[0,1]\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Well-behaved derivations on \(C[0,1]\) (English)
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let \(A\) be a *-derivation on \(C[0,1]\), define the operator \(pD\) on \(C[0,1]\) by \([pD](x)=p(x)f'(x)\), \(p\) is real valued in \(C[0,1]\). The author defines also accretive, and m-accretive operators on Banach spaces, the operator \(A\) is said to be well-behaved if \(A\) and \((-A)\) are accretive. The author proves that \(A\) generates a continuous group \(\{T_ t,t\in {\mathbb{R}}\}\) of *-automorphisms (i.e., \((-A)x=\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}(T_ tx-x))\) if and only if \(A\) is equivalent to the closure \(\overline{pD}\) of \(pD\). It is also proved that every well-behaved *-derivation on \(C[0,1]\) has an extension (possibly on a larger space) that generates a continuous group of *-automorphisms. Finally the author gives a partial solution of an unsolved problem (Does an accretive operator on a Banach space have an extension (possibly on a larger space) that is \(m\)-accretive?) by showing that every well-behaved *-derivation on \(C[0,1]\) has an \(m\)-accretive extension.
    0 references
    semigroups of operators
    0 references
    m-accretive operators on Banach spaces
    0 references
    well-behaved *-derivation on C[0,1]
    0 references
    extension
    0 references
    continuous group of *-automorphisms
    0 references
    m-accretive extension
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references