On invariant subspaces of matrices: a new proof of a theorem of Halmos (Q603155): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Invariant subspaces of a nilpotent operator on a Banach space. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3883021 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4040150 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the spectral analysis of direct sums of Riemann-Liouville operators in Sobolev spaces of vector functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the orbit of invariant subspaces of linear operators in finite-dimensional spaces (new proof of a Halmos's result) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Eigenvectors and adjoints / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3998992 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3935719 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3704461 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 10:04, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On invariant subspaces of matrices: a new proof of a theorem of Halmos
scientific article

    Statements

    On invariant subspaces of matrices: a new proof of a theorem of Halmos (English)
    0 references
    5 November 2010
    0 references
    \textit{P. R. Halmos} [Linear Algebra Appl. 4, 11--15 (1971; Zbl 0264.15001)], proved that if \(A\) is an \(n\times n\) matrix over the field of complex numbers and \(E\) is an \(A\)-invariant subspace, then there exist matrices \(B\) and \(C\) such that \(BA=AB\), \(CA=AC\), \(E\) is the kernel of \(B\) and \(E\) is the range of \(C\). In this paper the author gives an elementary elegant proof of this result and shows that there exist \(B\) and \(C\) that additionally satisfy \(BC=CB=0\). The author remarks that this result also holds for a matrix \(A\) with coefficients in any field \(K\).
    0 references
    invariant subspace
    0 references
    commutant
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers