When do the transpose and dual agree? (Q762255): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Modules with decompositions that complement direct summands / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Stable module theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Representation theory of artin algebras IV<sup>1)</sup>Invariants given by almost split sequences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Duality Theory for Injective Modules. (Theory of Quasi-Frobenius Modules) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Embedding of Rings in Skew Fields / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4101984 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Generalized uniserial rings and their Kupisch series / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Self-duality and serial rings / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Beiträge zur Theorie nichthalbeinfacher Ringe mit Minimalbedingungen. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3248050 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5734555 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finiteness of the injective hull / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Serial rings and finitely presented modules / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:48, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
When do the transpose and dual agree?
scientific article

    Statements

    When do the transpose and dual agree? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let R be an Artin-algebra, K its center and \({}_ KC\) an injective cogenerator. In the paper those indecomposable algebras R are determined for which \(M^*=Hom(M,R)\), resp. \(D(M)=Hom_ K(M,C)\) coincides with the Auslander-Bridger transpose tr M for all finitely generated R-modules M without projective direct summands. These are the Nakayama-algebras with one simple module in case D(M)\(\cong tr M\) and the self-injective Nakayama-algebras with c(R)\(\equiv 0 (n)\) in case \(M^*\cong tr M\), where c(R) is the (common) composition length of the indecomposable projective R-modules and n the number of simple modules.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Artin-algebra
    0 references
    center
    0 references
    injective cogenerator
    0 references
    indecomposable algebras
    0 references
    Auslander-Bridger transpose
    0 references
    Nakayama-algebras
    0 references
    self-injective Nakayama- algebras
    0 references
    composition length
    0 references
    number of simple modules
    0 references
    0 references