A two-point difference scheme for computing steady-state solutions to the conservative one-dimensional Euler equations (Q1057720): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Boundary Approximations for Implicit Schemes for One-Dimensional Inviscid Equations of Gasdynamics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Artificial Compressibility Methods for Numerical Solutions of Transonic Full Potential Equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fast, Conservative Schemes for the Full Potential Equation Applied to Transonic Flows / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Steady shock tracking and Newton's method applied to one-dimensional duct flow / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3217775 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:35, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A two-point difference scheme for computing steady-state solutions to the conservative one-dimensional Euler equations
scientific article

    Statements

    A two-point difference scheme for computing steady-state solutions to the conservative one-dimensional Euler equations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    An implicit finite-difference method is presented for obtaining steady- state solutions to the time dependent Euler equations, written in the conservation form, for flow containing shocks. The method uses a two- difference scheme for flux derivatives at subsonic points, at supersonic points, dissipation is added by retarded density concept, and the difference equations involve three points. However, the overall method retains the nice feature of the general two-point method as regards boundary conditions. Application of the method to quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow equations is introduced for five different test cases, combining subsonic and supersonic boundary conditions. Some comparison with three-point method is made. Calculated results show the method's advantages. Residuals can be reduced to machine zero in approximately 35 time steps for 50 mesh points. For one-dimensional Euler calculations, the scheme offers two advantages; the first is in regard to application of boundary conditions, the second is that the two-point algorithm is well-conditioned for large time steps.
    0 references
    implicit finite-difference method
    0 references
    steady-state solutions
    0 references
    time dependent Euler equations
    0 references
    flow containing shocks
    0 references
    dissipation
    0 references
    retarded density concept
    0 references
    two-point method
    0 references
    quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow
    0 references

    Identifiers