Bad company tamed (Q1036088): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4266051 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4949915 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5694788 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4793814 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4539489 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Consistency of predicative fragments of frege’s <i>grundgesetze der arithmetik</i> / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On modal logics which enrich first-order S5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: What truth depends on / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Frege's proof of referentiality / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Frege meets Dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bad company generalized / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Is Hume's principle analytic? / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:34, 2 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bad company tamed
scientific article

    Statements

    Bad company tamed (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 November 2009
    0 references
    The ``bad company problem'' is a problem plaguing the neo-Fregean project of basing mathematics on abstraction principles. Given the centrality of Hume's Principle (HP) in the foundation of the natural numbers, neo-Fregeans are interested in a broader class of abstraction principles that bear a formal resemblance to HP. However, not all such abstraction principles are acceptable, several of them, the ``bad companions'' of HP, leading to paradoxes, such as Russell's or Burali-Forti's paradox. With the aim of drawing ``a mathematically informative and philosophically well-motivated line between the acceptable abstraction principles and the unacceptable ones'', the author develops ``the idea of individuation as a well-founded process in a modal framework'' and introduces ``a natural and plausible restriction on the individuation of concepts'' which creates ``a safe environment for abstraction, where what used to be the bad companions now re-emerge as perfectly good ones.''
    0 references
    Hume's Principle
    0 references
    bad company problem
    0 references
    abstraction
    0 references
    Frege
    0 references
    logicism
    0 references
    neo-Fregeanism
    0 references
    paradox
    0 references

    Identifiers