Threshold models for comparative probability on finite sets (Q1584803): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q52074523, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712286835472
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Representation of finitely additive semiordered qualitative probability structures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Weak Qualitative Probability on Finite Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5615833 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Betweenness, orders and interval graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The axioms of subjective probability / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Interval models for comparative probability on finite sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:12, 30 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Threshold models for comparative probability on finite sets
scientific article

    Statements

    Threshold models for comparative probability on finite sets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    2 January 2002
    0 references
    The paper considers comparative probability relations \(\succ\) defined on the power set \({\mathcal B}_S\) of a finite state space \(S\). For these relations the author proposes necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a probability \(P\) defined on \({\mathcal B}_S\) and a nonnegative relevant threshold function \(\Omega\) defined on \({\mathcal B}_S\times {\mathcal B}_S\) such that \[ A\succ B\Leftrightarrow P(A)>P(B)+\Omega(A,B). \] In particular the paper analyzes the problem when \(\Omega\) is supposed to be a bivariate function (considering both nonseparable and separable case) and when \(\Omega\) is a univariate function. All the conditions proposed in the paper are stated in terms of sums of indicator functions and then they are essentially algebraic conditions.
    0 references
    comparative probability
    0 references

    Identifiers