Eigenvalue attraction (Q267728): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5694789 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3396283 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3249645 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Wegner Estimate and Level Repulsion for Wigner Random Matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5388761 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Brownian-Motion Model for the Eigenvalues of a Random Matrix / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-Hermitean delocalization: multiple scattering and bounds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4317769 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3998482 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3247887 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4110164 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5674306 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Random matrices: universality of local eigenvalue statistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4337625 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Lidskii--Vishik--Lyusternik Perturbation Theory for Eigenvalues of Matrices with Arbitrary Jordan Structure / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3425498 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2739722 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An introduction to manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How Many Eigenvalues of a Random Matrix are Real? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The spectra of large Toeplitz band matrices with a randomly perturbed entry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: How many zeros of a random polynomial are real? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The probability that a random real Gaussian matrix has \(k\) real eigenvalues, related distributions, and the circular law / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hamiltonian Control of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups: Stabilization and Convergence Speed / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Stabilizing entangled states with quasi-local quantum dynamical semigroups / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:12, 11 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Eigenvalue attraction
scientific article

    Statements

    Eigenvalue attraction (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    11 April 2016
    0 references
    The conventional wisdom from random matrix theory is that eigenvalues repel one another. This stems from the fact that the degeneracy of an eigenvalue is a codimension two phenomenon for real symmetric matrices and a codimension-three phenomenon for complex Hermitian matrices. For reasonable distributions on the entries of the matrix, the probability that two eigenvalues are close is small for real symmetric matrices and yet smaller for complex Hermitian matrices. Something particularly relevant to this paper is that if the entries of the matrix \(M_0\) evolve under symmetric (or Hermitian) Brownian motion, \(t \mapsto M(t)\), \(M(0) = M_0\) a.s., then the eigenvalues evolve according to Dyson Brownian motion -- with each eigenvalue exerting a repulsive force on the others. A fact discussed in this paper is that this repulsion is a consequence of the symmetry conditions, not Brownian motion. The main result of the paper is that for a smooth flow on real matrices \(t \mapsto M(t)\), with no symmetry conditions, complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues (non-zero imaginary part) exert a (possibly zero) attractive force on one another. The force is inversely proportional to the magnitude of the imaginary part of the eigenvalue. Thus, in the absence of forces from other eigenvalues, the acceleration vector of the eigenvalues in a complex conjugate pair will be directed toward the real axis (assuming \(\ddot M(t) = 0\)). As evidenced by the simple matrix \[ M(t) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} + t \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}, \] the attraction property does not mean the eigenvalues will collide as \(t \to \infty\). Assume \(\lambda(t)\) is a complex eigenvalue, \(\lambda(0) > 0\) with \(\dot \lambda(0) = v_0 > 0\). Generally, if \(\ddot \lambda(t) = -i a(t)\) where \(a(t) \geq 0\) is integrable and if \(v_0\) is sufficiently large, then \(\dot \lambda(t) > 0\) for all \(t\) -- there is no collision on the real axis. Nonetheless, with appropriately unbiased random dynamics it is conceivable that some eigenvalues will experience forces that drive them to collide on the real axis. This paper clearly drives this intuition. The paper specializes the results to normal and circulant matrices. The results are further specialized to some examples, including the Hatano-Nelson model. \texttt{MATLAB(R)} code is included.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    eigenvalue perturbation theory
    0 references
    random matrix theory
    0 references
    Hatano-Nelson model
    0 references
    normal matrices
    0 references
    symmetric matrices
    0 references
    Hermitian matrices
    0 references
    Brownian motion
    0 references
    circulant matrices
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references