From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities (Q310469): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: XII. On the theory of probabilities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5600508 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Einstein Was Right! / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2884962 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5797024 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Mathematician’s Viewpoint to Bell’s theorem: In Memory of Walter Philipp / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Contextual approach to quantum formalism / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Is the contextuality loophole fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5569065 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4942086 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:00, 12 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities
scientific article

    Statements

    From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 September 2016
    0 references
    Summary: In 1862, George Boole derived an inequality for variables that represents a demarcation line between possible and impossible experience. This inequality forms an important milestone in the epistemology of probability theory and probability measures. In 1985 Leggett and Garg derived a physics related inequality, mathematically identical to Boole's, that according to them represents a demarcation between macroscopic realism and quantum mechanics. We show that a wide gulf separates the ''sense impressions'' and corresponding data, as well as the postulates of macroscopic realism, from the mathematical abstractions that are used to derive the inequality of Leggett and Garg. If the gulf can be bridged, one may indeed derive the said inequality, which is then clearly a demarcation between possible and impossible experience: it cannot be violated and is not violated by quantum theory. This implies that the Leggett-Garg inequality does not mean that the SQUID flux is not there when nobody looks, as Leggett and Garg suggest, but instead that the probability measures may not be what Leggett and Garg have assumed them to be, when no data can be secured that directly relate to them. We show that similar considerations apply to other quantum interpretation-puzzles such as two-slit experiments.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references