On supnorm estimates for \(\bar \partial\) on infinite type convex domains in \(\mathbb C^{2}\) (Q555687): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Support functions for convex domains of finite type / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hölder estimates on convex domains of finite type / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5621558 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5630092 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(L^ 2\) estimates and existence theorems for the \(\partial\)-operator / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hölder and <i>L</i><sup><i>p</i></sup> estimates for solutions of ∂<i>u</i> = <i>f</i> in strongly pseudoconvex domains / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Integral kernels and Hölder estimates for \({\bar \partial}\) on pseudoconvex domains of finite type in \({\mathbb{C}}^ 2\) / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 07:42, 4 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On supnorm estimates for \(\bar \partial\) on infinite type convex domains in \(\mathbb C^{2}\)
scientific article

    Statements

    On supnorm estimates for \(\bar \partial\) on infinite type convex domains in \(\mathbb C^{2}\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 July 2011
    0 references
    The authors study the \(\bar\partial\) equation on some convex domains of infinite type in \(\mathbb C^2\). They prove that supnorm estimates hold for some infinite exponential type domains, provided the exponent is less than 1. (The reader is informed that it is not known whether 1 is optimal in the considerations.) The authors consider the following example: Let \(\chi :\mathbb R_{+} \cup \{0\} \to \mathbb R_{+}\) be a smooth function such that \(\chi'' (t) \geq 0\) everywhere, \(\chi'' (t) > 0\) for all \(t \in (1, 1 + a)\), and \[ \chi(t) = 1\quad\text{for} \quad t \in [0, 1], \] \[ \chi(t) =1 + \exp\bigg( - \frac{1}{ (t-1)^{\alpha/2 }}\bigg)\quad\text{for} \quad t \in (1, 1 + \varepsilon), \] and \[ \chi(t) = t - \eta\quad \text{for}\quad t \geq 1 + a, \] where \(a >\varepsilon > 0\), \(a > \eta > 0\) are small numbers such that \(\chi',\chi'',\chi''' > 0 \text{ on } \mathbb R_{+} \cup \{0\}.\) The domain \(\Omega\subset \mathbb C^2\) is defined as follows: \[ \Omega=\Big\{(z_1 , z_2 ) \in \mathbb C^2 : \rho(z_1 , z_2 ) = \chi\big(|z_1 |^2 \big) + |z_2 |^2 < 4\Big\}. \] Roughly speaking, this domain is a rounded off ball cut by a cylinder. A similar construction is carried out for the bidisc with its corners rounded off and for some other domains. It is shown that supnorm estimates hold on these domains. The idea is to split the boundary into three parts: one which contains the flat points, one which contains the uniformly convex points, and the third one consists of the convex boundary points near to the flat part. Two different ideas of Henkin are extensively used to obtain the authors results, when dealing with parts one and two of the boundary. The main difficulty is when dealing with the third part. The explicit nature of the examples makes it possible to control some integrals over that part of the boundary. It is interesting whether the result holds for more general infinite-type domains and in dimension greater than \(2\).
    0 references
    supnorm estimate
    0 references
    infinite D'Angelo type
    0 references
    pseudoconvex
    0 references

    Identifiers