The crossing number of satellite knots (Q740544): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: JSJ-decompositions of knot and link complements in \(S^3\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Divergence-free fields: Energy and asymptotic crossing number / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The first 1,701,936 knots / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Core curves of triangulated solid tori / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The crossing number of composite knots / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Algorithmic topology and classification of 3-manifolds / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:27, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The crossing number of satellite knots
scientific article

    Statements

    The crossing number of satellite knots (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    3 September 2014
    0 references
    A knot \(K\) is a satellite of another knot \(L\) if, up to isotopy, it lies in a neighbourhood of \(L\) in a non-trivial way. The crossing number \(c(K)\) of a knot \(K\) is the minimal number of crossings in a diagram of \(K\). It has been conjectured that if \(K\) is a satellite of \(L\) then \(c(L)\leq c(K)\). In this paper, it is proved that this relationship holds up to a constant factor (more precisely, that \(c(L)\leq 10^{13} c(K)\)). The author notes that the method of proof has been chosen for simplicity rather than to minimize the bound. However, it does not seem possible that this method would yield the full conjecture. The proof builds on earlier work of the author [J. Topol. 2, No. 4, 747--768 (2009; Zbl 1190.57003)] that addresses the same question in the case that \(K\) is a connected sum with \(L\) as one summand. In fact, this earlier result is also used in this proof. A key special case that has to be considered separately is when \(K\) is a \(2\)--cable of \(L\). The large-scale idea of the proof is to find a `short' arc within a handle structure on a particular \(3\)--manifold. In most cases the arc is found using a normal surface. Although such a surface will in general have high complexity relative to the handle structure, the idea of `generalised parallelity bundles' allows the author to detect regions to avoid, so that the chosen path lies within a sufficiently small subsurface. Another important case is finding a `short' core curve in a handle structure for a solid torus. This is addressed in another paper by the author [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 366, No. 11, 6027--6050 (2014; Zbl 1321.57024)]. In addition to the main result, the author gives two alternative versions that have smaller bounds but are weaker in other ways.
    0 references
    0 references
    satellite knot
    0 references
    crossing number
    0 references
    2-cable
    0 references
    parallelity bundle
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references