Regular graphs are antimagic (Q888592): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Antimagic Labeling of Regular Graphs / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Regular Graphs of Odd Degree Are Antimagic / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A dynamic survey of graph labeling / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3999001 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 23:36, 10 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Regular graphs are antimagic |
scientific article |
Statements
Regular graphs are antimagic (English)
0 references
2 November 2015
0 references
Summary: An undirected simple graph \(G=(V,E)\) is called antimagic if there exists an injective function \(f:E\to\{1,\dots,|E|\}\) such that \(\sum_{e\in E(u)} f(e)\neq\sum_{e\in E(v)} f(e)\) for any pair of different nodes \(u,v\in V\). In this note we prove -- with a slight modification of an argument of \textit{D. W. Cranston} et al. [J. Graph Theory 80, No. 1, 28--33 (2015; Zbl 1321.05229)] -- that \(k\)-regular graphs are antimagic for \(k\geq 2\).
0 references
antimagic labeling
0 references
regular graphs
0 references