Non-deterministic semantics for dynamic topological logic (Q1006607): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2744124 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dynamic Topological Completeness for / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3509059 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On dynamic topological and metric logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The modal logic of continuous functions on the rational numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dynamic topological logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Well-Quasi-Ordering, The Tree Theorem, and Vazsonyi's Conjecture / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Propositional temporal logics: decidability and completeness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3371957 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:13, 29 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Non-deterministic semantics for dynamic topological logic
scientific article

    Statements

    Non-deterministic semantics for dynamic topological logic (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 March 2009
    0 references
    This paper belongs to a program of propositional dynamic topological logic DTL intended to bridge a gap between logic and mainstream mathematics. The models of DTL are dynamical systems \((X,T,f)\) consisting of a topological space \((X,T)\) and a continuous function \(f\) on this space. The atomic formulas (propositional variables) are interpreted by subsets of \(X\), the Boolean operations are standard, the modality \(\square\) is the topological interior. The temporal connective \(\circ\) is the ``next'' operator: the point \(x\) is in \(\circ A\) iff \(f(x)\) is in \(A\). The temporal connective \(*A\) is interpreted as ``always in the future'', more precisely as the intersection of \(A, \circ A,\circ\circ A,\) etc. In this way the dual connective \(\#A=\widetilde*\widetilde A\) is interpreted as the orbit of \(A\). This paper proves that DTL (with continuous functions) is recursively enumerable. The proof uses essentially all tools accumulated up to now in this area. This seems to be one of the first (maybe the first) examples of an undecidable but axiomatizable interesting propositional system introduced by semantics and not by an axiom system. The problem of axiomatizing DTL is still open. Ordinary Kripke models turn out to be insufficient to obtain axiomatizability and decidability results. The author uses (what he calls) typed Kripke frames, i.e. frames with sufficiently saturated sets of formulas assigned to each world. The main Kripke-style object is a non-deterministic quasi-model \((W,R,t,g)\): a typed frame \((W,R,t)\) with a typing \(t\), plus a continuous relation (instead of a function) on worlds, \(g: W \to W\). These objects satisfy some coherence conditions which constitute one of the achievements of this work. To check the correspondence with the original semantics of dynamical systems, a transformation of a non-deterministic quasi-model into an equivalent dynamical system is defined. Limit models and a shift operator appear here. A hierarchy of finite frames is designed to get an analog of a finite-model property. Kruskal's lemma is applied to get an enumeration of unsatisfiable formulas of DTL.
    0 references
    dynamic topological logic
    0 references
    temporal logic
    0 references
    spatial logic
    0 references
    typed Kripke frames
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers