\(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only (Q1906520): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
| Property / full work available at URL | |||
| Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01190966 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
| Property / OpenAlex ID: W1499434560 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 10:44, 30 July 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | \(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only |
scientific article |
Statements
\(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only (English)
0 references
25 February 1996
0 references
A natural quasigroup associated with a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system is examined, and it is shown that except when the cycle length \(m\) is 3, 5, or 7, the 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems cannot be equationally defined. The proof proceeds by producing a quasigroup associated with a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system, for which a particular homomorphic image does not arise from a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system.
0 references
cycle system
0 references
cycle decomposition
0 references
quasigroup
0 references
2-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems
0 references
