Martingale solutions and invariant measures for stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces (Q1613661): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4149(99)00034-4 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1511908575 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 08:53, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Martingale solutions and invariant measures for stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces |
scientific article |
Statements
Martingale solutions and invariant measures for stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces (English)
0 references
29 August 2002
0 references
The factorization procedure, proposed by \textit{G. Da~Prato, S. Kwapień} and \textit{J. Zabczyk} [Stochastics 23, 1-23 (1987; Zbl 0634.60053)] as a method of establishing regularity of trajectories of mild solutions to stochastic evolution equations in Hilbert spaces, proved itself a useful tool in other problems as well. The second author and \textit{B. Gołdys} [Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 46, No. 1-2, 41-51 (1994; Zbl 0824.60052)] used it to find martingale solutions of a semilinear stochastic partial differential equation \[ dX = (AX + F(t,X)) dt+ G(t,X) dW \tag{1} \] in a Hilbert space, where \(A\) is a generator of a compact \(C_0\)-semigroup and \(F\), \(G\) are continuous functions of a linear growth. \textit{G. Da Prato}, the second author and \textit{J. Zabczyk} [Stochastic Anal. Appl. 10, No. 4, 387-408 (1992; Zbl 0758.60057)] employed the factorization method to give sufficient conditions, in the autonomous case, for the existence of invariant measures for (1), again under the linear growth assumption on \(F\) and \(G\). The aim of the paper under review is to generalize these two results, first, by replacing the linear growth of \(F\) by a suitable dissipativity hypothesis, and second, by allowing more general state spaces than the Hilbert space (namely, type 2 UMD Banach spaces are considered). The very basic scheme of proofs remains the same as in the papers cited above, however, the details are quite different and rather delicate analysis is required.
0 references
stochastic partial differential equations
0 references
invariant measures
0 references
UMD Banach spaces
0 references
radonifying operators
0 references
dissipative mappings
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references