On \(C(K)\) Grothendieck spaces (Q861988): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02874635 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2030637055 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:44, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On \(C(K)\) Grothendieck spaces |
scientific article |
Statements
On \(C(K)\) Grothendieck spaces (English)
0 references
2 February 2007
0 references
The main result in this paper is a list of ten equivalent formulations of the statement `` \(C(K)\) is a Grothendieck space.''The paper is inspired by \textit{H. P. Lotz} [Math. Z. 190, 207--220 (1985; Zbl 0623.47033)], where many properties of Grothendieck spaces having also the Dunford--Pettis property are uncovered, in the sense that several of the results from that paper are shown to have a converse in the \(C(K)\) case. Combining one of these theorems with a result of \textit{J. M. A. M. Van Neerven} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 116, No. 2, 525--527 (1992; Zbl 0895.47031)] one obtains one equivalent statement: ``Every strongly continuous semigroup on \(C(K)\) has bounded generator.'' Using this the authors deduce e.g. that `` No infinite-dimensional WCG space is complemented in \(C(K)\)''\ is also an equivalent statement. On the other hand, already ``\(c_o\) is not complemented in \(C(K)\)'' assures that \(C(K)\) is a Grothendieck space. The paper ends with a section containing some examples and remarks
0 references
Grothendieck spaces
0 references
Dunford-Pettis property
0 references
0 references
0 references