How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds (Q2476985): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s10107-006-0044-x / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10107-006-0044-X / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:22, 18 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds
scientific article

    Statements

    How good are interior point methods? Klee-Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 March 2008
    0 references
    \textit{V. Klee} and \textit{G. J. Minty} [in: Inequalities III, Proc. 3rd Symp. Los Angeles 1969, 159--175 (1972; Zbl 0297.90047)] gave an example for which the simplex method takes an exponential number of iterations. By refining a variant of the Klee--Minty example, the authors exhibit a nearly worst-case example for path-following interior point methods. It has been proven that solving this \(n\)-dimensional linear optimization problem requires at least 2 of power n minus 1 iterations.
    0 references
    linear programming
    0 references
    interior point method
    0 references

    Identifiers