Thin position for knots and 3-manifolds (Q930740): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2007.12.006 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.TOPOL.2007.12.006 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 08:32, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Thin position for knots and 3-manifolds
scientific article

    Statements

    Thin position for knots and 3-manifolds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 July 2008
    0 references
    The concept of thin position for a knot was first introduced by Gabai. Roughly speaking, \(K \subset S^3 - (\text{two points}) \cong S^2 \times \mathbb{R}\) is said to be in thin position, if it minimizes a certain complexity related to the intersections of \(K\) with the spheres \(S^2 \times \{t\}\) within its isotopy class. An analogous definition of thin position for a handle decomposition of a 3-manifold \(M\) has been given by Scharlemann and Thompson. In this case the complexity is related to the level surfaces of the corresponding Morse function on \(M\). Here the authors compare the two notions of thin position. In particular, they prove that: if \(K \subset S^3\) is a 2- or 3-bridge knot, then the handle decomposition that the double branched cover of \((S^3,K)\) inherits from a thin position of \(K\) is thin. They also observe that this correspondence does not hold in general, counterexamples being provided by torus knots with higher bridge number.
    0 references
    double branched cover
    0 references
    bridge position
    0 references
    thin position
    0 references
    3-manifold decomposition
    0 references

    Identifiers