Topological obstructions for vertex numbers of Minkowski sums (Q1003631): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2008.05.009 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.JCTA.2008.05.009 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:13, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Topological obstructions for vertex numbers of Minkowski sums
scientific article

    Statements

    Topological obstructions for vertex numbers of Minkowski sums (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    4 March 2009
    0 references
    \textit{K. Fukuda} and \textit{C. Weibel} [Discrete Comput.\ Geom.\ 37, No. 4, 503--516 (2007; Zbl 1125.52009)] have shown that, if \(r < d\), then for \(i = 1,\ldots,r\) there are polytopes \(P_i\) in \(\mathbb{R}^d\) with an arbitrarily large number \(f_0(P_i)\) of vertices, such that the Minkowski sum \(P_1 + \cdots + P_r\) achieves the maximum number \(\prod_i \, n_i\) of vertices. In contrast, the present author proves that, if \(r \geq d\) and \(f_0(P_i) > d\) for each \(i\), then \[ f_0(P_1 + \cdots + P_r) \leq \left(1 - \frac1{(d+1)^d}\right) \prod_i \, f_0(P_i). \] This follows from the stronger result that, if \(P\) is isomorphic to a \(d\)-fold product of \(d\)-simplices and \(\pi: P \to \mathbb{R}^d\) is a linear projection, then \(f_0(\pi P) \leq f_0(P) - 1 = (d+1)^d - 1\). The proof uses Gale transforms and van Kampen-type obstructions.
    0 references
    Minkowski sum
    0 references
    number of vertices
    0 references
    Gale transform
    0 references
    van Kampen
    0 references

    Identifiers