Binary univariate dual and primal subdivision schemes (Q489971): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s40324-014-0017-6 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S40324-014-0017-6 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:39, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Binary univariate dual and primal subdivision schemes
scientific article

    Statements

    Binary univariate dual and primal subdivision schemes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 January 2015
    0 references
    Subdivision is a process that for a given coarse polygon (control polygon) recursively refines it using some predefined rules. This is a very popular method of generating curves and is broadly utilized in computer graphics. In the paper, the authors introduce a family of subdivision schemes \(H_l\) for \(l = 0, 1, 2, \dots\), generated using two well-known subdivision schemes. The first scheme is a four point binary interpolating scheme introduced in [\textit{N. Dyn} et al., Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 4, 257--268 (1987; Zbl 0638.65009)], and the second scheme is a relaxed version of the first one and was given in [\textit{K. Hormann} and \textit{M. A. Sabin}, ibid. 25, No. 1, 41--52 (2008; Zbl 1172.65308)]. After the introduction of the family \(H_l\), the authors show that for \(l = 0, 2, 4, \ldots\) the elements of the family are primal subdivision schemes and for \(l = 1, 3, 5, \ldots\) they are dual subdivision schemes. Next, the authors make different analyses of the family. They start with finding the lower and upper bound on the Hölder continuity. Using the bounds the authors show that elements of the proposed family have higher Hölder continuity as compared to the parent schemes. Then, they prove that the reproducing degree of \(H_l\) for \(l = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\) is cubic and show the limit stencil for \(l = 0, 1, 2\). Finally, the authors analyse the magnitude of artifact. They derive the magnitude of artifact for the schemes \(H_0\), \(H_1\) and \(H_2\) and next compare them with each other and with the magnitude of artifact of the first parent scheme.
    0 references
    subdivision curve
    0 references
    primal scheme
    0 references
    dual scheme
    0 references
    subdivision scheme
    0 references
    Hölder continuity
    0 references

    Identifiers