Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators (Q334909): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s11118-016-9557-y / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S11118-016-9557-Y / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:04, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Harnack inequality for hypoelliptic second order partial differential operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 November 2016
    0 references
    The authors consider non-negative solutions of second order hypoelliptic equations \[ {\mathcal L}u(x)=\sum_{i,j=1}^n \partial_{x_i}(a_{ij}(x)\partial_{x_j}u(x) ) + \sum_{i=1}^n b_i(x)\partial_{x_i} u(x)=0 \quad \text{ in } \Omega \] where \(\Omega\) is a bounded open subset of \(\mathbb R^n\) and \(x\) denotes the point of \(\Omega.\) For any fixed \(x_0\in \Omega, \) the authors prove a Harnack inequality of the type \[ \sup_K u\leq C_K u(x_0)\qquad \forall \;u \quad \text{ s.t. } \;{\mathcal L} u=0, \;u\geq 0, \] where \(K\) is any compact subset of the interior of the \({\mathcal L}\)-propagation set of \(x_0\) and the constant \(C_K\) does not depend on \(u.\)
    0 references
    Harnack inequality
    0 references
    hypoelliptic operators
    0 references
    potential theory
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references