Uniform subconvexity and symmetry breaking reciprocity (Q1727409): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q128814900, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1728347902604
 
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q128814900 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:58, 8 October 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Uniform subconvexity and symmetry breaking reciprocity
scientific article

    Statements

    Uniform subconvexity and symmetry breaking reciprocity (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 February 2019
    0 references
    The main result of this paper is the new subconvexity result for \(\mathrm{GL}(2)\). It provides new uniform subconvexity bounds for \(L\)-functions in the level and the eigenvalue aspect. More precisely, let \(q\) be a prime, \(\tau\in\mathbb{R}\), \(t\in\mathbb{R}\cup [-i\vartheta_0,i\vartheta_0]\), and \(T=1+|t|\), where \(\vartheta_0\leq 7/64\) denotes an admissible exponent for the Selberg eigenvalue conjecture. Let \(f\) be a Hecke-Maaß cusp form of eigenvalue \(\lambda =1/4 + t^2\), level \(q\) and primitive central character. Then \[ L(1/2+i\tau,f)\ll_{\tau,\varepsilon} (qT)^\varepsilon \left( q^{\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{128}}T^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1-2\vartheta_0}{20}} + q^{\frac{1}{8}}T^{\frac{1}{2}} \right) \] for any \(\varepsilon >0\). This improves the previous subconvexity results in the level aspect obtained by \textit{W. Duke} et al. [Invent. Math. 149, No. 3, 489--577 (2002; Zbl 1056.11072)] and by \textit{V. Blomer} et al. [Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 40, No. 5, 697--740 (2007; Zbl 1185.11034)]. Although the same result with the same proof would hold for holomorphic forms, with the weight playing the role of \(T\), this paper puts focus on Maaß forms, because the case of holomorphic forms is considerably easier [\textit{W. Duke} et al., Invent. Math. 143, No. 2, 221--248 (2001; Zbl 1163.11325)]. Perhaps even more important then the result itself is the symmetry breaking reciprocity formula, which is the key ingredient in its proof. It is a reciprocity formula relating \begin{itemize} \item the fourth moment of automorphic \(L\)-functions of level \(q\) an primitive central character twisted by \(\ell\)-th Hecke eigenvalue, that is, \[ \sum_{f\in \mathcal{B}(q,\chi)} |L(1/2,f)|^4 \lambda_f(\ell), \] where the sum is over an orthogonal basis for the space of cuspidal Maaß newforms of level \(q\) and a primitive character \(\chi\) modulo \(q\), and \(\lambda_f(\ell)\) is the \(\ell\)-th Hecke eigenvalue of \(f\), and \item the twisted mixed moment of automorphic \(L\)-functions of level \(\ell\) and trivial central character, that is, \[ \sum_{f\in \mathcal{B}(\ell,\mathrm{triv})} L(1/2,f)^3 L(1/2,f\times\bar{\chi}), \] where the sum is over an orthogonal basis for the space of cuspidal Maa{ss} forms of level \(\ell\) and the trivial central character, where \(\ell\) is prime. \end{itemize} The point is that the \(L\)-functions in this reciprocity formula are not of the same type on both sides of the identity.
    0 references
    0 references
    spectral reciprocity
    0 references
    moments of \(L\)-functions
    0 references
    amplification
    0 references
    subconvexity
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers