On the least number of palindromes in two-dimensional words (Q2286748): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q127471245, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1722205759638
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2019.06.030 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.TCS.2019.06.030 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:08, 17 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the least number of palindromes in two-dimensional words
scientific article

    Statements

    On the least number of palindromes in two-dimensional words (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 January 2020
    0 references
    The notion of palindromic factor in a word can be extended to bidimensional words (also called pictures) by extending the notion of reverse of a word to 2D arrays. The authors give tight bounds on the minimal number of 2D palindromes in a bidimensional word, depending on the alphabet size, both in the periodic and in the aperiodic case. In particular, they prove that any 2D infinite binary word must contain at least \(20\) distinct 2D palindromic sub-blocks, and this number becomes equal to the size of the alphabet for larger alphabets. In the case of aperiodic words, they show that the minimum is between \(20\) and \(28\) for 2D binary words, it is \(5\) for ternary words and it is equal to the size of the alphabet for larger alphabets.
    0 references
    0 references
    combinatorics on words
    0 references
    two-dimensional words
    0 references
    number of palindromes
    0 references

    Identifiers