Weighted maximal inequalities for the Haar system (Q1647819): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q129963308, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1729947016210
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00605-018-1184-9 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00605-018-1184-9 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:53, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Weighted maximal inequalities for the Haar system
scientific article

    Statements

    Weighted maximal inequalities for the Haar system (English)
    0 references
    27 June 2018
    0 references
    Let \(h=(h_n)_{n\geq0}\) be the collection of Haar functions on \([0, 1)\), given by \[ \begin{aligned} h_0&=\chi_{[0, 1)}, \\ h_1&=\chi_{[0, 1/2)}-\chi_{[1/2, 1)}, \\ h_2&=\chi_{[0, 1/4)}-\chi_{[1/4,1/2)}, \\ h_3&=\chi_{[1/2, 3/4)}-\chi_{[3/4,1)}, \\ h_4&=\chi_{[0, 1/8)}-\chi_{[1/8,1/4)} \\ h_5&=\chi_{[1/4, 3/8)}-\chi_{[3/8,1/2)}, \\ h_6&=\chi_{[1/2, 5/8)}-\chi_{[5/8,3/4)} \\ h_7&=\chi_{[3/4, 7/8)}-\chi_{[7/8,1)} \end{aligned} \] and so on. A weight \(\omega\) is called a dyadic \(A_p\) weight with \(p\in(1, \infty)\), if \[ [\omega]_{A_p}=\sup_I\left(\frac1{|I|}\int_I\omega\right)\left(\frac1{|I|}\int_I \omega^{-1/(p-1)}\right)^{p-1}<\infty; \] and \(\omega\) is called a dyadic \(A_1\) weight, if \[ [\omega]_{A_1}=\sup_I\left(\frac1{|I|}\int_I\omega\right)/{\mathop{\operatorname{essinf}}_I}\omega<\infty. \] Here in the both conditions, the suprema are taken over all dyadic subintervals \(I\) of \([0, 1)\). This paper studies the weighted maximal \(L^p\)-inequalities for the Haar system \(h=(h_n)_{n\geq0}\), with the optimal dependence on the characteristics of the weights involved. The author shows that for \(p\in(1, \infty)\), if \(\omega\) is a dyadic \(A_p\) weight, \(N\) is a non-negative integer, \(a_0, a_1,\dots, a_N\) are real numbers and \(\varepsilon_0, \varepsilon_1,\dots, \varepsilon_N\) is a sequence of signs, then \[ \left\|\max_{0\leq n\leq N}\left|\sum_{k=0}^n \varepsilon_ka_kh_k\right|\right\|_{L^p(\omega)} \leq 2^{1+1/p}C_p[\omega]_{A_p}^{\max\{1, 1/(p-1)\}}\left\|\sum_{k=0}^N a_kh_k\right\|_{L^p(\omega)}. \] Moreover, the exponent \(\max\{1, 1/(p-1)\}\) is the best possible. The author also shows that for any parameters \(p,q\in[1, \infty)\), there is a constant \(C_{p,q}\) depending only on \(p\) and \(q\) which has the following property: \[ \left\|\max_{0\leq n\leq N}\left|\sum_{k=0}^n \varepsilon_ka_kh_k\right|\right\|_{L^q(\omega)} \leq C_{p,q}[\omega]_{A_p}\left\|\max_{0\leq n\leq N}\left|\sum_{k=0}^n a_kh_k\right|\right\|_{L^q(\omega)}. \] Moreover, the linear dependence on the \(A_p\) characteristics is optimal for each \(p\). The proofs exploit the Bellman function method by deducing the validity of the above two weighted norm inequalities from the existence of certain special functions which enjoy appropriate size conditions and concavity.
    0 references
    maximal
    0 references
    dyadic
    0 references
    Bellman function
    0 references
    best constants
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers