Structural completeness in propositional logics of dependence (Q334998): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Fan Yang / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
The paper studies three logics of dependence: \textsf{PD}, \textsf{InqL} and \textsf{PT}. None of these logics is closed under uniform substitutions, but they are closed under substitutions of a particular type: flat substitutions which map propositional variables to flat formulas. A flat formula is a classical formula satisfying the condition \(X \models \varphi \Leftrightarrow \forall v, \{v\} \models \varphi\). In a natural way, admissibility of a rule can be defined in terms of flat substitutions. It is proven that all three aforementioned logics are closed and structurally complete relative to flat substitutions. | |||
Property / review text: The paper studies three logics of dependence: \textsf{PD}, \textsf{InqL} and \textsf{PT}. None of these logics is closed under uniform substitutions, but they are closed under substitutions of a particular type: flat substitutions which map propositional variables to flat formulas. A flat formula is a classical formula satisfying the condition \(X \models \varphi \Leftrightarrow \forall v, \{v\} \models \varphi\). In a natural way, admissibility of a rule can be defined in terms of flat substitutions. It is proven that all three aforementioned logics are closed and structurally complete relative to flat substitutions. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Alex Citkin / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B60 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B55 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6646572 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
propositional logic | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: propositional logic / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
dependence logic | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: dependence logic / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
inquisitive logic | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: inquisitive logic / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
inference rule | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: inference rule / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
admissible rule | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: admissible rule / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
structural completeness | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: structural completeness / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 04:56, 28 June 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Structural completeness in propositional logics of dependence |
scientific article |
Statements
Structural completeness in propositional logics of dependence (English)
0 references
1 November 2016
0 references
The paper studies three logics of dependence: \textsf{PD}, \textsf{InqL} and \textsf{PT}. None of these logics is closed under uniform substitutions, but they are closed under substitutions of a particular type: flat substitutions which map propositional variables to flat formulas. A flat formula is a classical formula satisfying the condition \(X \models \varphi \Leftrightarrow \forall v, \{v\} \models \varphi\). In a natural way, admissibility of a rule can be defined in terms of flat substitutions. It is proven that all three aforementioned logics are closed and structurally complete relative to flat substitutions.
0 references
propositional logic
0 references
dependence logic
0 references
inquisitive logic
0 references
inference rule
0 references
admissible rule
0 references
structural completeness
0 references