DE-sinc methods have almost the same convergence property as SE-sinc methods even for a family of functions fitting the SE-sinc methods. II: Indefinite integration (Q380323): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The article deals with the theoretical convergence rate of the sinc indefinite integration combined with the double-exponential (DE) transformation for a class of functions for which the single-exponential (SE) transformation is suitable. Although the DE transformation is considered as an enhanced version of the SE transformation for sinc-related methods, the function space for which the DE transformation is suitable is smaller than that for SE, and therefore, there exist some examples such that the DE transformation is not better than the SE transformation. Even in such cases, however, some numerical observations in the literature suggest that there is almost no difference in the convergence rates of SE and DE. In fact, recently, the observations have been theoretically explained for two explicit approximation formulas: the sinc quadrature and the sinc approximation. The conclusion is that in such cases, the DE's rate is slightly lower, but almost the same as that of the SE. The contribution of this study is the derivation of the same conclusion for the sinc indefinite integration. Numerical examples that support the theoretical result are also provided.
Property / review text: The article deals with the theoretical convergence rate of the sinc indefinite integration combined with the double-exponential (DE) transformation for a class of functions for which the single-exponential (SE) transformation is suitable. Although the DE transformation is considered as an enhanced version of the SE transformation for sinc-related methods, the function space for which the DE transformation is suitable is smaller than that for SE, and therefore, there exist some examples such that the DE transformation is not better than the SE transformation. Even in such cases, however, some numerical observations in the literature suggest that there is almost no difference in the convergence rates of SE and DE. In fact, recently, the observations have been theoretically explained for two explicit approximation formulas: the sinc quadrature and the sinc approximation. The conclusion is that in such cases, the DE's rate is slightly lower, but almost the same as that of the SE. The contribution of this study is the derivation of the same conclusion for the sinc indefinite integration. Numerical examples that support the theoretical result are also provided. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 41A25 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65D30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6226641 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
sinc approximation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: sinc approximation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
SE transformation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: SE transformation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
double-exponential (DE) transformation
Property / zbMATH Keywords: double-exponential (DE) transformation / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 11:36, 29 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
DE-sinc methods have almost the same convergence property as SE-sinc methods even for a family of functions fitting the SE-sinc methods. II: Indefinite integration
scientific article

    Statements

    DE-sinc methods have almost the same convergence property as SE-sinc methods even for a family of functions fitting the SE-sinc methods. II: Indefinite integration (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 November 2013
    0 references
    The article deals with the theoretical convergence rate of the sinc indefinite integration combined with the double-exponential (DE) transformation for a class of functions for which the single-exponential (SE) transformation is suitable. Although the DE transformation is considered as an enhanced version of the SE transformation for sinc-related methods, the function space for which the DE transformation is suitable is smaller than that for SE, and therefore, there exist some examples such that the DE transformation is not better than the SE transformation. Even in such cases, however, some numerical observations in the literature suggest that there is almost no difference in the convergence rates of SE and DE. In fact, recently, the observations have been theoretically explained for two explicit approximation formulas: the sinc quadrature and the sinc approximation. The conclusion is that in such cases, the DE's rate is slightly lower, but almost the same as that of the SE. The contribution of this study is the derivation of the same conclusion for the sinc indefinite integration. Numerical examples that support the theoretical result are also provided.
    0 references
    sinc approximation
    0 references
    SE transformation
    0 references
    double-exponential (DE) transformation
    0 references

    Identifiers