Exponentiated gamma distribution: different methods of estimations (Q442854): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / review text | |||
Summary: The exponentiated gamma (EG) distribution and Fisher information matrices for complete, Type I, and Type II censored observations are obtained. Asymptotic variances of the different estimators are derived. Also, we consider different estimators and compare their performance through Monte Carlo simulations. | |||
| Property / review text: Summary: The exponentiated gamma (EG) distribution and Fisher information matrices for complete, Type I, and Type II censored observations are obtained. Asymptotic variances of the different estimators are derived. Also, we consider different estimators and compare their performance through Monte Carlo simulations. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62F12 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62N01 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
| Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65C05 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
| Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6063350 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 01:28, 30 June 2023
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Exponentiated gamma distribution: different methods of estimations |
scientific article |
Statements
Exponentiated gamma distribution: different methods of estimations (English)
0 references
6 August 2012
0 references
Summary: The exponentiated gamma (EG) distribution and Fisher information matrices for complete, Type I, and Type II censored observations are obtained. Asymptotic variances of the different estimators are derived. Also, we consider different estimators and compare their performance through Monte Carlo simulations.
0 references
