Representing homomorphisms of distributive lattices as restrictions of congruences of rectangular lattices (Q451078): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
This paper is the newest contribution to the problem of representing finite distributive lattices as congruence lattices of lattices with special properties. The results are mostly of technical character and are prompting alternative proofs of known theorems (cf. [\textit{G. Grätzer} and \textit{E. Knapp}, Acta Sci. Math. 75, No. 1--2, 29--48 (2009; Zbl 1199.06029); \textit{E. T. Schmidt}, Acta Sci. Math. 77, No. 1--2, 47--52 (2011; Zbl 1249.06022)]. We can present a typical example: Every finite nontrivial distributive lattice \(D\) is isomorphic to the congruence lattice of a rectangular lattice. (Recall that a finite lattice \(M\) is called rectangular, if \(M\) is planar, semimodular, \(|M|\geq 3\), and there exists only one couple \(a, b\in M-\{0,1\}\) of double-irreducible elements such that \(a\) is the left weak corner and \(b\) is the right weak corner of \(M,\) respectively, and both elements are complementary in \(M.\))
Property / review text: This paper is the newest contribution to the problem of representing finite distributive lattices as congruence lattices of lattices with special properties. The results are mostly of technical character and are prompting alternative proofs of known theorems (cf. [\textit{G. Grätzer} and \textit{E. Knapp}, Acta Sci. Math. 75, No. 1--2, 29--48 (2009; Zbl 1199.06029); \textit{E. T. Schmidt}, Acta Sci. Math. 77, No. 1--2, 47--52 (2011; Zbl 1249.06022)]. We can present a typical example: Every finite nontrivial distributive lattice \(D\) is isomorphic to the congruence lattice of a rectangular lattice. (Recall that a finite lattice \(M\) is called rectangular, if \(M\) is planar, semimodular, \(|M|\geq 3\), and there exists only one couple \(a, b\in M-\{0,1\}\) of double-irreducible elements such that \(a\) is the left weak corner and \(b\) is the right weak corner of \(M,\) respectively, and both elements are complementary in \(M.\)) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Tibor Katrińák / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 06D05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 06B10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 06C10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6087533 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
distributive lattice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: distributive lattice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
quasiordering
Property / zbMATH Keywords: quasiordering / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
semimodular lattice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: semimodular lattice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
slim lattice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: slim lattice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
rectangular lattice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: rectangular lattice / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
congruence lattice
Property / zbMATH Keywords: congruence lattice / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 11:23, 30 June 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Representing homomorphisms of distributive lattices as restrictions of congruences of rectangular lattices
scientific article

    Statements

    Representing homomorphisms of distributive lattices as restrictions of congruences of rectangular lattices (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 September 2012
    0 references
    This paper is the newest contribution to the problem of representing finite distributive lattices as congruence lattices of lattices with special properties. The results are mostly of technical character and are prompting alternative proofs of known theorems (cf. [\textit{G. Grätzer} and \textit{E. Knapp}, Acta Sci. Math. 75, No. 1--2, 29--48 (2009; Zbl 1199.06029); \textit{E. T. Schmidt}, Acta Sci. Math. 77, No. 1--2, 47--52 (2011; Zbl 1249.06022)]. We can present a typical example: Every finite nontrivial distributive lattice \(D\) is isomorphic to the congruence lattice of a rectangular lattice. (Recall that a finite lattice \(M\) is called rectangular, if \(M\) is planar, semimodular, \(|M|\geq 3\), and there exists only one couple \(a, b\in M-\{0,1\}\) of double-irreducible elements such that \(a\) is the left weak corner and \(b\) is the right weak corner of \(M,\) respectively, and both elements are complementary in \(M.\))
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    distributive lattice
    0 references
    quasiordering
    0 references
    semimodular lattice
    0 references
    slim lattice
    0 references
    rectangular lattice
    0 references
    congruence lattice
    0 references